Cultural Landscape Definition World Heritage Committee
By the term cultural landscape permanently imprinted by humans is usually Landscape referred. Together with the opposing term " natural landscape ", a complementary pair of terms ( dichotomy ) is created. Depending on the definition, z. B. urban landscape , industrial or economic landscape and the rural area are partly counted as cultural landscapes, but partly not.
Important factors for the creation and development of the cultural landscape are the nature (site conditions) of the natural area with its fauna and flora as well as the interactions that result from the anthropogenic change in the natural area. In folklore and in so-called historical cultural research , a branch of historical regional studies , the term 'cultural landscapes' does not indicate material landscapes, but rather cultural areas . Schematic representation of the three most common definitions of "cultural landscape" In the scientific literature of the geosciences and biosciences , as well as in publications from regional planning and nature conservation , the term "cultural landscape" is used in a variety of ways and in some cases significantly different from one another. The main reason for this inconsistency lies in the assessment of hemerobia (measure of the overall influence of humans on natural ecosystems ) : "Who shapes the landscape more - humans or nature?" Is the "question of faith". Three basic definitions can be formulated: Lapland's mountains: "reindeer pasture cultural landscape" or wilderness? The quantitative interpretation is sometimes used polemically in debates . According to this definition, the entire land surface of the earth would have to be regarded as a cultural landscape today, since at least anthropogenic emissions can be detected everywhere. Accordingly, a distinction to the natural landscape would be obsolete. This broad interpretation has most of the supporters among landscape planners . As an example of anthropogenic changes from wilderness to cultural landscape, the Amazon region and the terra preta found there , a soil that has been anthropogenically changed over centuries and occurs on large areas along the course of the rivers , is often cited. The broad interpretation is often criticized and leads to debates in terms of "wilderness or cultural landscape?". For example, the question arises of how the processes of global climate change are to be assessed in this context. Cultural landscapes appear in more or less large proportions as not intended procedural effects of human activities. In this sense, the uninhabitable anecumene of the earth (inland ice, glacier, deserts without vegetation), but also the parts of the subecumene that are not permanently settled are included in the natural landscapes. These would be natural areas such as the primary forests of the humid tropics or the steppes and tundras of Asia, which traditionally are only used temporarily and extensively. Even through overexploitation destroyed ecosystems in the wilderness regions is expected by this definition, not to cultural landscapes. The entire ecumenical movement - from rural areas to settlement or urban landscapes to industrial and economic landscapes - is included here as cultural landscapes. This also includes all "overgrown" areas within the ecumenical movement that were historically shaped by man. Remnants of hat forests or very old protected areas are also part of this, as they are island-like relics in the populated area and are not beyond "clear influences". In this context, frequent visitors who leave their mark and disrupt the ecosystem, and the no longer existing European megafauna (e.g. bison, aurochs, elk, brown bear), whose landscape-shaping role remains vacant, are mentioned in this context . Depending on how you look at it, around 50 to 70% of the land surface can be assigned to these anthropogenic landscapes at the beginning of the 21st century. This notion is commonly used by geographers and landscape ecologists . It found its way into the international scientific debate , not least through the geographic school Carl Ortwin Sauer (Berkeley School) on American geography. The term anthropogenic landscape is sometimes used synonymously for this definition. This also forms the basis for the concept of anthropogenic biomes according to Ellis and Ramankutty , for example . Heathland areas in Central Europe are undoubtedly cultural landscapes by any definition. Sababurg primeval forest : Hutewald cultural landscape until the middle of the 19th century, unused since: Today is the destination of " primeval forest" visitors, tomorrow a natural landscape again? This close consideration is based on subjective notions of "desirable landscapes" and plays an important role in nature conservation in particular . To distinguish it from other definitions, the term historical cultural landscapes or cultural landscapes related to certain areas is sometimes used . Around 15 percent of the world's land area can be regarded as "cultural landscapes close to settlement" (Residential irrigated and residential rainfed mosaic cropland according to Alder C. Ellis and Navin Ramankutty). For example, the Central European cultural landscape is understood to mean an area characterized by agricultural use in which the use has not exceeded a certain level of intensity. In this way, very species- rich biotopes (for example wet meadows, heaths, orchards) emerged up to the first half of the 20th century , which then largely disappeared again in the course of the further intensification of agriculture. Such historical cultural landscapes of Europe are more species-rich (→ see: Biodiversity ) than a naturally formed forest community . Due to their peculiarities, different cultural landscapes can be distinguished from one another. The qualitative approach is also expressed in different "varieties". Two examples: The word culture (in the agricultural sense) is understood here not only as reclamation and maintenance of the soil , but rather as an expression of human activity in rural areas. The same standards apply to the landscaping as to the cultural buildings and intellectual and cultural ideas and traditions . As a result, not only the plant cover is relevant, but also every visible sign of the farmer's attachment to the landscape . In terms of the type, extent and intensity of cultivation, he made use of the largely self-stabilizing natural balance . Such man-made landscape elements are z. B. Hedge fringes and woody islands next to fields to protect against wind and dehydration. Individual trees such as high fruit trunks or oaks as shade trees on pastures. But also field edges and dry stone walls to reduce erosion damage and to facilitate cultivation. Stone bars were created when stony meadows or fields were reclaimed. These landscape elements, which were formerly useful in the sense of peasant agriculture, nowadays often interfere with the management of large areas. You experience cultural landscape protection z. B. through the designation as cultural monuments . As early as 1946, the Swiss geographer Hans Carol tried to combine the different terms in a scheme. Taking into account the current situation, the following categorization of cultural landscapes can be carried out: The World Heritage Committee provides the 1992 specific sites World Heritage Site with the addition of "cultural landscape". It also writes in its implementing provisions: "Cultural landscapes are cultural goods and represent the 'common works of nature and man' referred to in Article 1 of the Convention . They are exemplary of the development of human society and settlement over time under the influence of the physical limitations and / or possibilities that their natural environment as well as the successive social, economic and cultural forces acting from outside and inside. " The following cultural landscapes in German-speaking countries have so far been included in the list of UNESCO World Heritage Sites , as they are particularly worth preserving due to their "exceptional universal value": The inclusion in the UNESCO list includes a special obligation to preserve these cultural landscapes. The typical regional character of cultural landscapes can be described in more detail on the basis of historical cultural landscape elements. A distinction is made between structural elements (e.g. monuments, chapels and crosses) and use-related elements (e.g. sunken paths, field margins, orchards, avenues, hedges, vineyards and historical corridors). Many historical elements of the cultural landscape are evidence of earlier economic activity. They are referred to as historical cultural landscape elements if they would not arise again under the current economic and social conditions. The cultural landscape as a system of interaction between human activity and the natural environment is, in a sense that goes beyond the UNESCO definition, the subject of the Master of Cultural Landscapes (MaCLands) course, which is a European Master jointly organized by the Universities of Naples, St.-Étienne and Stuttgart is offered. Definitions
The quantitative approach
The value-neutral approach
The qualitative approach
structure
Cultural landscapes in the list of UNESCO World Heritage Sites
Germany
Austria
Switzerland
Historical cultural landscape elements
The scientific study of cultural landscapes
literature
Web links
Individual evidence
Cultural Landscape Definition World Heritage Committee
Source: https://de.zxc.wiki/wiki/Kulturlandschaft
0 Response to "Cultural Landscape Definition World Heritage Committee"
Post a Comment